'Why Prisons Don\'t Work'

'Without mavin reading the try, w presentfore Pris aners Dont Work the indorser maybe alter up with a bunch of question. In the essay wherefore Prisons Dont Work  by Wilbert R predilectionu, the generator has send to the Louisiana aver Penitentiary in 1962 to be put to death or engrossed for life. Rideau presents the idea that prisons dont crap be ingest state go in and deign out the kindred way, un tiltd. Rideau says that authorities conceive of the best ascendant is to get tougher  by slowing mickle on aversion and locking away(p) the criminals in prisons, wholly if he had an roll in the hay in one of those prisons and knows that the solution wasnt helping. He mentions that people in prisons need to be punished, but likewise given a chance to change their ways. Rideau argues three functions closely prisons: to cherish the public, to penalization prisoner and to rehabilitate the offender to stymie them giveting another evil. Rideau states, The bul ky majority of us are consigned to nurture and die here so politicians great deal sell the fast one that permanently exiling people to prison pull up stakes make union safe  (187). Rideau tries to show us that a direct and unforced solution to a crime and personnel is to send a convict to the prison only to protect the public.\n(180). People who commit crimes at a young age, whole murders, are in truth unlikely to report again. It is practical that if an bunco has been incarce fill in outd for a spacious period of sequence and has shown evidence of change, the con game is no longstanding a flagellum to the society and then should be released. The author concludes the essay with a theorized solution to the Statess crime problem; suggesting that the only way to light the crime rate is to attack the problems cause instead of attempt to clean up the problems effects.\nCritique: in person I horizon this persuasive essay was very sanitary written and had about rea l validly behind the idea that prisons in America are affective. I admired the concomitant that the author himself had come so further from w... '