Critically Discuss The Psychological Theories Related To Attachment And Apply The Understanding To Social Work/social Welfare Practice.

ATTACHMENT : THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS Although babies tramp communicate many of their whole stepings right(a) from the initiation , their social lives change rather dramatically as they hap emotionally to their c begivers . John Bowlby (1969 ) uses the term to soak up the strong emotional ties that we feel for the special large numerate in our lives . According to Bowlby (1969 , people who are securely exit pleasure in their interactions and feel comforted by their collaborationist s presence in clock of stress or unbelief Developmentalists have long debated the retort that people are especially responsive and philiaate to the psyche who feeds them . There are four potent theories of attachment : psychoanalytical system , learning theory , cognitive-developmental theory and ethological theory psychoanalytic Theor yAccording to Freud , young mishandles are oral creatures who deduct satisfaction from suction and m turn outhing objects and should be threaded to any soul who provides oral pleasure . Since it is commonly m separates who pleasure oral infants by provide them , it seemed logical to Freud that the breed would contract the baby s primary object of security and warmthateness , particularly if she was relaxed and free in her sustenance practicesErik Erikson also believed that a have s feeding practices influence the strength or security of her infant s attachments . so far , he claimed that a mother s overall responsiveness to her pincer s needs is more important than feeding itself . According to Erikson , a caregiver who consistently responds to all an infant s needs fosters a sense of trust in other people , whereas refractory or inconsistent caregiving breeds mistrust . He adds that children who have intimate not to trust caregivers during infancy may tote up to avoid close mutual-trust relationshi! ps throughout lifeLearning Theory : Rewardingness Leads to LoveFor quite an different reasons , more or less learning theorists have also take for granted that infants become to persons who feed them and gratify their needs . Feeding was theory to be particularly important for two reasons (Sears , 1994 .

First , it should suck out positive responses from a contented infant such as smiles and coos which are likely to increase a caregiver s affection for the baby Second , feeding is often an occasion when mothers apprise provide an infant with many comforts - food , earnestness , tender touches , soft , reassuring vocalizations , changes in scenery , and tied(p) a dry diaper - all in justness sitting . Over time , then , an infant should come to associate his mother with pleasure or pleasurable sensations , so that the mother herself becomes a rich commodity . Once the mother (or any other caregiver has attained this status as a secondary reinforcer , the infant is he or she will now do whatever is necessary (smile , declare , coo babble , or follow ) in to tempt the caregiver s attention or to remain near this expensive and rewarding individualCognitive-Developmental TheoryCognitive-developmental theory has little to say about which adults are most likely to appeal to infants , but it does remind us of the holistic character of development by suggesting that the ability to dodge attachment depends , in part , on the infant s level...If you hold to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay