there is alternative testify to that of Bennett levy and Marteaus research, there ar three examples of this:
Rapid learning Seligman effectuate that 2-4 shocks where enough to acquire a phobia by linking the shocks to a picture to a snake or spider this is known as clear instruct. He pitch that larger shocks where required to create the uniform type of phobia towards a picture of a flower.
The research from Bennett charge and Marteaus research was very different from this because they prove that it was the way the animal looked or moved that created fear of the animal, whereas Seligman apply unmingled conditioning and got the participant to associate the picture with the uncool feeling (shock).
The second example would be:
Extinction Öhman found that fears towards a stimulus such as houses or flowers became nonextant when it was no longer polar with a shock, and instead the fears became paired with stimuluss such as spiders or snakes, this evidence is not similar to Bennett and Marteaus, however it does link into the evidence from Seligmans research as they both talk about classical conditioning and the association between the stimulus and the shock.
The third is called Contrapreparedness, McNally and Reiss found that associations with the FR stimulus are not likely to be learnt, but conditioned. There is an association between the FR stimuli (picture of a spider), or FI stimuli (picture of a flower) with a safety signal, (absence of a shock), if the conditioning was successful than the person give be relieved when they do not feel the shock, so therefore eventually they will have no need to fear the stimulus.
This is different from Bennett Levys and Martueaus study as it does not hire the idea of classical conditioning but it does link into that of Seligman.If you involve to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment