Looking at Dickens & Swift's Proposal

In actuality, Swift uses his narrator's ill-timed logic and dodge faith in his hold incorrupt reasoning to show the dangers of social policy that blame the deplorable and oppressed for their problems. Swift is attacking the wealthy landowners and those in the side of meat government who support them in this essay. By using a narrator who confuses true reasoning with his own rationalizations and logic, Swift is cautioning against the dangers of be taken in by clever but defective reasoning. Swift is also satirizing the narrator whose morally-blind faith in the infallibility of his own reasoning leads him to believe cannibalism of the poor is a "modest" object, and he is warning readers how easily they can become fooled over confused social theory when the promoter of them is clever and powerful. Most govern the narrator completely irrational in his proposal, but the narrator claims that he is a true Christian concerned with the pledge of the poor. He quotes scientific experts, manipulates reason and science to justify his proposal, and stands as a moral degenerate even though he professes himself to be a truly enlightened Christian through with(predicate) rigorous logic. The following passage shows the irrationality of the narrator, but his blind faith in his proposal's theories makes him argue that his irrational thinking in truth represents justification for his theories:

Abrams, M. H. A colour of Literary Terms. New York, Rinehart & Co., 1959.

In conclusion, neither Swift's modest proposal for poor Irish Catholics or Dickens' recounting of hard clock for the working poor did much to bring close to changed conditions in society. While there were improvements in both areas, they were slowly brought about although these two works were received as harsh indictments of the multiplication in their respective eras.

Both of them through the use of derision and comedy helped the leadership self-reflect on problematic issues of the day. Satire and biliousness are effective methods for social change because they galvanize favorite opinion. Once the court of public opinion is convinced of the excellence of an action, legislators are typically bound to follow in a voting democracy. Thus, from our late night talk show hosts to our new-fangled artists, satire and humor are still the Vaseline that helps grease the cartroad for necessary social changes.

In a preposterous coat, same(p) a beadle's, with cuffs and flaps exaggerated to an unspeakable extent; in an immense waistcoat, knee breeches, buckled shoes, and a mad cocked-hat; with nothing naming him, and everything coarse material, moth-eaten, and full of holes; with seams in his black face, where fear and light up had started through the greasy composition, daubed all over it; anything so grimly, detestably, ludicrously shameful as the whelp in his comic livery, Mr. Gradgind never could by any other means have believed in, weighable and measured fact thought it was. And one of his model children had come to this!

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.